_ BATAVIA, Illinois, January. 07, 2008 (BUSINESS WIRE) — on December 13, 2007, Merriman Curhan Ford and CO _ (MCF) publish report on Fuel tech, Inc. (Nasdaq: _ FTEK) that its based up and quoted extensively of “independent study involving lining of industry an expert.” _ This “independent study” its accomplish by lining intelligence, LLC, completely possess subsidiary of MCF. _ D study its form available D following week and seven anonymous participants its quoted extensively Fuel tech have mark and to associate in most of this participant and united of them (or their management) agreeing to go “on D record” with D truth over this report from MCF’s lining intelligence _ here to be which they had say: _ Two of D participant its of Breen energy solution and its subsidiary, Quinapoxet solution _ letters on her interest its Mr. Ben Breen, President from Breen energy solution: _ “my intention in joining D WOOD PRESERVATION LINING its to contribute my expertise to D technically evaluation and estimate of D viability/validity of process and product involved in: _ 1st _ nitrogen oxide emission reduction of energy enterprise (particularly SNCR technology) and 2. Anti — cinder and wood preservation (additive technology) within this same energy enterprise steam boiler _ Since 1964, I have lead research and development and to form several nationally/internationally to recognize company operating successfully business into this two to catch _ entirely, I believe I its mislead regarding D nature and purpose of this report what seems to have focused on minimizing Fuel tech market potential and on D effectiveness of their technology _ D market potential for D SNCR technology its measure in one hundred of unit and one hundred of millions of Dollar, far beyond which from D a participant suggested like merely 10 unit _ that suggestion seem unrealistically or appropriately negative. _ SNCR market potential can be more further expanded technologically supply involving feed bake from operating information; _ like temperature and D ammonium Bi sulfate what examine mine Company, BES, have develop and at present market _ similarly D to commentate of lining more member the fact that a maximum reached through market from steam boiler anti — anti-lie-went having fuel additive already to be arisen to have absurdly _ I to believe D reached through current market can be greatly expanded, special if instrument equipment too monitor material time ignition to optimize soot burning through and chemical injection effective its unfolds _ additionally, Fuel tech Fuel Chem process drastically reduces SO3 expenditure however can be enhanced further with material time SO3 rueckgespraech control We to be actively working in both by those instrument equipment range _ mine Company in an advisory manner and to accomplish service into this catch and no better note for D Fuel _ technology its that we work to addition it technology whenever possible.” _ D participants the fact that have D to most negative thing too say over Fuel tech its participant number of 6, mark in D report like a “manager” in Westar energy _ that person his Mr. Terry Maddox and here its which Mr. Doug Sterbenz, main leader vice President and Chief operating more Officer from Westar, writes energy over this: _ “in D lining intelligence copy, Mr. Maddox its mark like” a manager “employ by Westar energy We believe this description may lead a reader to conclude the fact that Mr. Maddox its authorized by Westar energy to form D statement contained in D copy and that Westar energy of vouches for D accuracy and truth of D statement does not form by Mr. Maddox. We to be want absolutely reliably you understands this its D box _ for Westar energy does not authorize Mr. Maddox to participate in D lining intelligence lining discussion or to form any statement about it company or its product in D lining discussion, and Mr. Maddox’s without taking this activity company authorization its injury by company politics _ in addition, Westar energy do not authorize to be its name contained in D lining intelligence report. _ We also believe you should be consciously that Mr. Maddox not hold position in Westar energy that to be comparably to D main leader and more officer Position held by four by D participants not participate in D lining discussion. _ D position held by Mr. Maddox its manager, technology at Westar energy Jeffrey energy center _ it Report to D person responsible for everyday life management of D enterprise _ gentleman _ Maddox its also not a Westar energy more officer member by Westar energy older management crew _ in addition to D statement in D lining intelligence copy, I understand that Mr. Maddox may have form additionally statement too other that put it company’s product into a negative light _ Westar energy into none way to endorse any about D statement to form by Mr. Maddox or any from D research that he may have to state to lead as support for any from D statement.” _ Fuel tech believe you earn to know D truth. _ D fully letter of Mr. Breen and Mr. Sterbenz its communicate on our web site on www.ftek.com. _ SOURCE: _ Fuel tech, Inc. Fuel tech, Inc.. Vincent J. Arnone, 630-845-4500 Chief financially more Officer or Tracy h. bent one, 203-425-9830 vice President, investor relation copyright Business Wire 2008
source
bookmark this post:
Related articles:
Rival cause: 30, 000 a year.
Ford In-Houses Parts. Superior or Inferior?.
Tata Motor ‘ AA+ ‘ rtg on negative watch on focused discussions with ford motor - Crisil
Ford refused Sime Darby Report to Take Over Malaysia JV
Ford new holland tractor dealer wa.
